this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
669 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

84996 readers
2732 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 67 points 5 months ago (8 children)

Enron crashed because they were cooking their books and faking income, declaring potential profit where none existed

  • Sell chips to X

  • Receive stock in X

  • Value of stocks = discounted sum of future (fake) income

  • Booked as an asset on the balance sheet

This is exactly like Enron but the underlying commodity isn't energy, it's compute.

[–] enumerator4829@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago (6 children)

Nvidia sells plenty of GPUs for actual money, they are good for it.

No, the real issue is the depreciation for the people owning GPUs. Your GPU will be usable for 4-6 years, and 2-4 of those years will be spent as ”the cheap old GPU. After that time, you need new GPUs. (And as the models are larger by then, you need moahr GPU)

How the actual fuck do these people expect to get any ROI on that scale with those timeframes? With training, maybe the trained model can be an asset (lol), but for inference there are basically no residual benefits.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

enron sold plenty of gas and real things too: it’s the double handling that’s the problem; not the nature of the goods or services

[–] enumerator4829@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

The relative size of the double handling is the potential problem. I think Nvidia is just trying to extend the gold rush for a bit longer.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)