this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2025
124 points (95.6% liked)
Funny
12760 readers
615 users here now
General rules:
- Be kind.
- All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
- Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
- No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
- Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.
Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The issue being that one is unlikely to gain the experience necessary to fully leverage the power of the tool, if it's the primary way to code, because it does too much, to readily...
How many CNC guys have the intuition of an of old school master machinist? Some do, most don't. Plus, one of those masters can viably run many machines, with an unskilled observer monitoring to catch catastrophic fails. Fewer good jobs because of that. When automaton takes the learning out of the curve, very few people will put in the extra effort to grow beyond what's needed for minimum viability, with all the knock on consequences that brings.
LLM coding may not kill programming as we know it right now, but I think it's just a matter of time, just like with US machining/manufacture. Once the learning track to mastery becomes unrewarded, very few will walk it.