this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2025
103 points (95.6% liked)

Linux

10788 readers
793 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Ategon@programming.dev
anzo@programming.dev
dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev
103
44% Of GNOME Core Apps Are Written In C, 13% In JavaScript & 10% In Rust (www.phoronix.com)
submitted 1 day ago by cm0002@toast.ooo to c/linux@programming.dev
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

GNOME developer Sophie Herold has shared some interesting end-of-year code stats for the GNOME project. The "GNOME" codebase is up to 6,692,516 lines of code at the end of 2025 with 1,611,526 lines of that being from GNOME apps. Where the data gets interesting is on the programming language breakdown in different areas.

Of the official GNOME Core apps, Sophie found that 44.8% of them are written in the C programming language. That's followed by Vala with 20.7% and then JavaScript at 13.8%. Following JS is Rust with 10.3% of the GNOME Cores apps codebase being in Rust. Trailing Rust is Python at 6.9% and C++ at 3.45%.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] imecth@fedia.io 4 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

You could always read the original source and find out the intent, but who has time for that?

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I did read the source, but that doesn't change what I said. Lines of code is a shit metric. The source even specifically says, "...line of code is of course a questionable metric" then says how 400k lines of rust are auto generated in bindings.

So after re-reading, the intent of the article is to compare lines of code between different languages and their percentage of gnome. It's apples and oranges, and a meaningless, shit metric.

[–] jasory@programming.dev 2 points 19 hours ago

The bizarre thing is that they are only analysing something like 40 programs/library. You could reach the same conclusion clicking through their gitlab for a few minutes.

The translation rate is the actually interesting part.