this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2025
1284 points (99.2% liked)
Technology
81933 readers
2647 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's not lossless but current ogg vorbis at 160kbps is absolutely transparent for the vast majority of people. That's actually what I chose to keep my own collection, I mean, outside of the lossless albums that I absolutely want to flawlessly preserve.
How does it compare to 192 and 320 bps mp3?
I'd say in general it's the same, but way lighter than 320 kbps mp3. It's better than 192 kpbs mp3 and as good or better than 256 kbps mp3.
Thanks.
I hear the diff between 192 & 320 (probably 256 is enough but better safe than sorry I thought so that's what I use) so 160 vorbis is very good but not totally perfect for me then.