this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2025
1044 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

78015 readers
4142 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 18 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I wish I could think anything positive about this, but I can't imagine anyone who actually cares about music needs or wants this. Instead it'll almost certainly be used as an illegal and unethical dataset to further train bullshit AI to make slop songs. As easy as it is for people to claim "preservation", I do have to question the motives of stuff like this...

Fuck AI. Support your favorite human artists.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago

It's a good thing if you are smart enough to understand that AI isn't going away. Universal bought udio, the "legal" variant of the dataset will be used to train models, only they will be closed source, censored and come with a ToS that gives all the rights from the generated music to the record companies from the get go.

At least this gives open source a chance.

[–] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world 18 points 23 hours ago

I mean, it seems like the perfect avenue to replicate Stremio / Kodi but for music

[–] paper_moon@lemmy.world 13 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

I guess it's easier packaged in a torrent rather than individual downloads, but I do question why anyone would need this if all they were doing was training AI, as everything is already available on YouTube for free. You don't need to hack a company to get the audio. Now if you're a human trying to actually listen to the songs, obviously the Spotify torrent will sound much better, assuming the hack captured the higher quality audio streams from Spotify. All the youtube downloaders sound like crap because its like 128kbps m4a (at least on newpipe, though you can do 160kbps opus if you want)

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago

Yeah, the people who are racing to download it all want to use it for profit. AI companies, companies that run databases, etc.

[–] llama@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Same it seems useless to me. The real value is knowing how songs relate to each other in terms of being played before/after other songs, and that's only available via internal datasets that they could never scrape anyway.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 4 points 21 hours ago