this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2025
-19 points (25.6% liked)

Thoughtful Discussion

374 readers
5 users here now

Welcome

Open discussions and thoughts. Make anything into a discussion!

Leaving a comment explaining why you found a link interesting is optional, but encouraged!

Rules

  1. Follow the rules of discuss.online
  2. No porn
  3. No self-promotion
  4. Don't downvote simply because you disagree or as a reaction to a title. Doing so may result in a temp community ban.

More posting guidelines can be found here:

https://discuss.online/post/33592245

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

this is such a dumb take.

“if you are talking to a chatbot you arent doing other things like driving!”

[–] m_f@discuss.online 3 points 2 weeks ago

Are you talking about this bit?

How concerned should you be about spending 0.8 Wh? 0.8 Wh is enough to: [..] Drive a sedan at a consistent speed for 4 feet

Or this bit?

If your friend were about to drive their personal largest ever in history cruise ship solo for 60 miles, but decided to walk 1 mile to the dock instead of driving because they were “concerned about the climate impact of driving” how seriously would you take them?

I don't think it's saying “if you are talking to a chatbot you arent doing other things like driving!”, I think the point is that you probably do lots of other things every day that dwarf the energy consumption you could use on LLMs, and you don't avoid doing those because of their energy usage. For example, nobody* is complaining about the energy usage of Netflix or Youtube, but they dwarf chatgpt:

*I'm sure it's not actually nobody, but I'd bet it rounds to 0, and either way is far less than the number of people complaining about AI energy usage.