this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2025
83 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

10788 readers
719 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Here is some news that both excited me and gave me pause. In its annual 2025 retrospective, published today, Arch-based CachyOS, widely popular among Linux gamers and heavily focused on performance optimization, reveals plans I did not expect: an expansion into the server space.

“In addition to our ongoing PGO and AutoFDO optimizations, we are developing a specialized ‘Server’ Edition for NAS, workstations, and server environments. We intend to provide a verified image that hosting providers can easily deploy for their customers. This edition will ship with a hardened configuration, pre-tuned settings, and performance-optimized packages for web servers, databases and more!”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rozodru@pie.andmc.ca 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

honestly if they do this I will slap it on my server. I love CachyOS, it's a great and solid distro and by far the best Arch fork out there. I've never had issues with it and while sure the install is probably the longest out of all the distros I've used it's still great. Very solid team behind it.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I love CachyOS, it's a great and solid distro and by far the best Arch fork out there. I've never had issues with it

As long you keep it updated. I left my machine powered off for 8 months and came back to being impossible to update it because the repo was missing library updates from months prior... I could never figure it out, and just nuked the install with bazzitte.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

Had the same experience with EndeavourOS. Also switched to bazzite and haven't looked back. There was a slight learning curve, but once you figure it out, you can do pretty much anything you want to/on it.

[–] wltr@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why would you want it? Especially for a server. If you can just use Arch. The installation part takes 5 minutes, if you’re not doing it the very first time. My very gist Arch server is about 6 years now, no need to reinstall, always updated.

[–] rozodru@pie.andmc.ca 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

because I like cachyos and want to try their server version?

[–] wltr@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Hey, but that’s barely an explanation. I don’t force Arch on you, I am just curious what specifically you like about this fork. Is it some DE being pre-installed and pre-configured? Why would it matter for a server then? Or is it something else? If so, do you mind sharing more? Perhaps you have some blog about that. I like reading people new to Linux.

[–] rozodru@pie.andmc.ca 3 points 16 hours ago

why do I need to explain it to you? I already said I like CachyOS and I want to try the server version. that's it.

[–] Excel@beehaw.org 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why would I want Arch when I can use CachyOS? Defaults matter.

[–] wltr@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That’s why I’m asking, what’s the difference? Which defaults? I have never used CachyOS and have no idea what it brings to the table. I use Arch for ~7 years, and I’m no looking for a replacement. Especially an Arch based one. Yet, I’m curious of the difference, and why one would want Cachy, especially as a server.

[–] adminofoz@lemmy.cafe 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I used vanilla arch as a daily driver for about 3 years and I loved it. but started to need a more ephemeral OS and switched to atomic fedora and centos/Alma precisely for the defaults. So i know you asked about cachyOS and I dony have an answer there. So you can skip the rest of this if that is all you wanted. Im not saying RHEL or bust. Each person has their own needs and i highly recommend just going and doing the hard things yourself to learn, but I get it that it isnt possible for everyone.

What defaults? Several. 1st SELinux. 2nd ability to select old kernels on boot. 3. Firewall enabled out of the box.

Sure you can do a lot of additional hardening and nothing is to stop a simple bash script from setting these up on Arch, but I figured I only know a little bit and those have saved my ass multiple times. So there are probably other things the folks in that ecosystem have figured out that I dont know about yet.

[–] Vorpal@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I too run an Arch and am happy with it, and I would like to know why Cachy. The only reason I can see is having x86-64-v3 packages instead of baseline. That is nice, but on it's own doesn't feel worth the effort of switching over.

Defaults don't matter to me much, as I automate and manage my system config in git (using a tool I wrote myself: https://github.com/VorpalBlade/paketkoll/tree/main/crates/konfigkoll inspired by https://github.com/CyberShadow/aconfmgr). It makes it a breeze to set up a new computer as I want it.

[–] wltr@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

I don’t want to spill some memes worth Arch elitism here, but I just doubt Arch derivatives crowd knows what x86-64-v3 thing is. Truth be told, I barely understand that myself. So I guess the difference should lie somewhere else. My previous research showed that the crowd is afraid of no installer installer, but these days Arch has some kind of installer, doesn’t it?

I’m just struggle to grasp what does it have, what those defaults are? A DE and whatnot? Is it just an opinionated Arch? Looks quite popular for everyone and their dog to have their own opinionated Arch this year, isn’t it?

[–] rozodru@pie.andmc.ca 1 points 16 hours ago

heaven forbid you go read about it. You're weird, man. Takes all of 5 seconds to web search the distro and find what makes it different.