this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2025
444 points (93.7% liked)

Technology

78015 readers
3405 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] natecox@programming.dev 70 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Did I miss something? Title is “DIY” but it looks like a sales page?

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 78 points 3 days ago

Welcome to modern astroturfing in the social media age.

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 29 points 3 days ago (3 children)

There is a build page on the github for the device.

[–] natecox@programming.dev 7 points 3 days ago

I see no link to GitHub, but I do see two links to crowd supply.

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 6 points 3 days ago

There's no such link. Can't even find one through Google

[–] batman0730@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Is there? Mind sharing the link?

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I'll find it after Christmas. I got a fork a bit ago when looking at the code.

I think its based on https://github.com/atomic14/diy-esp32-epub-reader

Build logs: https://hackaday.io/project/204323-diptyx-e-reader

[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Those aren't build logs. Those are "I took an open source software package and put commercial hardware around it."

Which is fine, since it's MIT software (and why I push for GPL, personally). What's not fine is a creator calling their commercial product "open" or "DIY" without a BOM or build log.

I would revise the post title regardless of what the author calls it, personally.

[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I posted this as a comment on the creator's post. Will have to see if they respond.

I see "open" in the title, but no git or Bill of Materials (BOM) links. Is this actually open? Or based on other's open efforts?