this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2025
205 points (98.1% liked)

unix_surrealism

3108 readers
246 users here now

The underscore is very important!

A place to share original content related to computers, content, surrealism, wizardry and everything else.

analognowhere things of interest:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

signes your child may be hacked

idk the link so here is the mastodon post about it https://merveilles.town/@prahou/113442370828460378

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] swelter_spark@reddthat.com 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Hyperthreading is insecure?

[โ€“] recursivethinking@lemmy.world 15 points 11 hours ago

So remember that it's one core (physical) acting as if it was 2 (virtual). Each of these vCores could be assigned to separate workloads on a server. But because it's ultimately one core, threadA could possibly access data in threadB. If A was a different entity than B, then entity A could access entity B's data.

It's more that CPU architecture is insecure in general.

But so is literally everything when you go down the deep dark rabbit hole of all the tech we use. Meltdown, Spectre, rowhammer, VMScape. The one where they can figure out your password from the sound of your keyboard while you're on a zoom call.