this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2025
928 points (96.1% liked)

People Twitter

8902 readers
403 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Twinklebreeze@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Not to mention damaging a tree that could easily be 50+ years old.

[–] InfiniteStruggle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Unlikely that a pocket knife could do anything to a tree that is 50 years old. All the stuff on the outside is dead bark, and it's usually thick enough to keep curious knives away from the inside.

[–] Twinklebreeze@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

It can be surprisingly easy to damage living bark tissue with even a pocket knife.

[–] BryceBassitt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You must think woodpeckers are the devil then

[–] Twinklebreeze@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Woodpeckers build nests in dead wood, and the insects they eat out of live wood can help keep the tree healthy. Even if it harms the tree biodiversity is good. A human with a knife does not increase biodiversity.

I, for one, would rather they eat from the trees than try to knock bugs off house siding

Outside of my bedroom

At sunrise

[–] BryceBassitt@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

On no a tree with slightly less bark, what ever will it do?

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago

Die, if enough bark is damaged. Suffer if less than that.

Enough is surprisingly little.