this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2025
1348 points (98.4% liked)

People Twitter

8791 readers
2044 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah this smacks of "but wind turbine blades aren't recyclable"! So? It's still better than what we were doing before.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

wind turbine blades aren’t recyclable

I didn't even know about that.

Wonder if they could crush them up and use them as concrete aggregate.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Nope, they put them in big graveyards

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Need to figure out a reclamation process, but nobody's trying just yet.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

They're genuinely just not that recyclable. And that's fine, they're still really helpful

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Its not, but its less not-fine than fossil fuels.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 2 hours ago

The world doesn't have to go on forever, only 5 billion more years

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Close. We sharpen them to use against the Kaiju.

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"made mainly of carbon fiber, fiberglass, and balsa wood" from some random source. Doesn't sound like anything particularly toxic or difficult to source. I can't imagine putting them in landfill is a serious problem. So my response is "so what".

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why not?

Carbon fiber and fiberglass in concrete foundations would limit microplastics and add strength to the product. Throwing a never-decomposing product into a landfill is just taking up space for something that can decompose over a couple of hundred years. Reuse it at least once it there's a viable solution.

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure. I mean, you could. Probably there are better sources, like construction waste, that you'd want to exhaust first, but I obviously haven't done a serious cost-benefit analysis, nor am I really qualified. My intuition is that you could do it but there are better uses of the time and money.

Relatively inert stuff in a landfill doesn't seem like the highest-priority use of the time and money. The resources used to scrap and recycle a wind turbine blade could probably be much better used for more consequential purposes.

[–] TheOakTree@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

I don't like the idea of crushed fiberglass in landfills, but it's far down the list of awful things we do to the planet. I think you're correct in assuming the effort is better spent elsewhere.