this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
378 points (93.0% liked)

Selfhosted

63263 readers
444 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
ayyy@sh.itjust.works
curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world
378
Suboptimal ways to respond to a public security incident (lemmy.stuart.fun)
submitted 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) by andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
94 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

This issue is already quite widely publicized and quite frankly "we're handling it and removing this" is a much more harmful response than I would hope to see. Especially as the admins of that instance have not yet upgraded the frontend version to apply the urgent fix.

It's not like this was a confidential bug fix, this is a zero day being actively exploited. Please be more cooperative and open regarding these issues in your own administration if you're hosting an instance. πŸ™

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tko@tkohhh.social 2 points 3 years ago (2 children)

Where is this Matrix Channel? Is it private? How can I get access as an instance admin?

[–] ColonelPanic@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 years ago (1 children)
[–] andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun 3 points 3 years ago

Presumably that channel (I hadn't seen it there) and https://matrix.to/#/#lemmydev:matrix.org, which is actually where I was watching for the fix.

[–] kresten@feddit.dk 4 points 3 years ago (2 children)

It isn't private, I think there's a link on the girhub

[–] hawkwind@lemmy.management 2 points 3 years ago (1 children)

If the only criteria to be in a private channel for admins is being an admin, there’s no use making it private. ;) Unless your just looking to filter out bad actors who don’t want to take 5 min and 5$ to make an instance.

[–] kresten@feddit.dk 2 points 3 years ago

I have an account that's in there without being an administrator.

[–] andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun 1 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Yep, it's public on github.

[–] kresten@feddit.dk 2 points 3 years ago

I was actually speaking of the matrix channel