this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
126 points (98.5% liked)

Politics

1127 readers
116 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1-3, 6 & 7 No longer applicable

Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

The Epstein Files: Trump, Trafficking, and the Unraveling Cover-Up

Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)

Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

Video: Macklemore's new song critical of Trump and Musk is facing heavy censorship across major platforms.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Last week, when Donald Trump announced a bailout for farmers hurt by his own economic agenda, the president boasted that the payments would be financed by revenue generated by trade tariffs. That was problematic for a variety of reasons, but primarily because the claim wasn’t true: The money was coming from a USDA fund, not tariff revenue.

Trump might’ve liked the idea of tariffs generating a pool of money he could draw upon to reward people he likes, but his public assertion was entirely made up.

This week, something very similar happened. The Washington Post reported on the White House’s announced $1,776 “warrior dividend” bonuses to service members.

The obvious red flag was that tariff revenue is actually far short of Trump’s claims, and the money that does exist has already been set aside for a variety of other administration priorities.

But as the dust settled on the presidential address, a different problem emerged: Since the president cannot legally spend tariff money without congressional approval, where was the money for the “warrior dividend” payments actually going to come from?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I'd support our service members getting more money no matter how misguided or corrupt the person making the decision is proving to be.

That being said, Trump isn't giving them more money he's just giving them the money that has already been allocated to them... but instead of using it to provide housing assistance through programs he's just writing a check. It's not a gift, it's accounting fuckery that cost Trump nothing and certainly didn't come from tariff funds.