Politics

1133 readers

388 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1-3, 6 & 7 No longer applicable

Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

The Epstein Files: Trump, Trafficking, and the Unraveling Cover-Up

Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)

Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

Video: Macklemore's new song critical of Trump and Musk is facing heavy censorship across major platforms.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

126

“Trump’s new ‘warrior dividend’ for troops isn’t new — the money is coming from housing assistance funds approved in July as part of the reconciliation bill. (www.ms.now)

submitted 3 months ago by pelespirit@sh.itjust.works to c/politics@sh.itjust.works

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Last week, when Donald Trump announced a bailout for farmers hurt by his own economic agenda, the president boasted that the payments would be financed by revenue generated by trade tariffs. That was problematic for a variety of reasons, but primarily because the claim wasn’t true: The money was coming from a USDA fund, not tariff revenue.

Trump might’ve liked the idea of tariffs generating a pool of money he could draw upon to reward people he likes, but his public assertion was entirely made up.

This week, something very similar happened. The Washington Post reported on the White House’s announced $1,776 “warrior dividend” bonuses to service members.

The obvious red flag was that tariff revenue is actually far short of Trump’s claims, and the money that does exist has already been set aside for a variety of other administration priorities.

But as the dust settled on the presidential address, a different problem emerged: Since the president cannot legally spend tariff money without congressional approval, where was the money for the “warrior dividend” payments actually going to come from?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I would hope people in the military have a higher sense of self worth. After taxes they're getting less than $1500, and prices on everything are higher than they were a year ago. The bonuses probably don't even offset the increases in prices from tarrifs that Trump put in place. So basically he fucked up the economy, cost everyone several extra thousand dollars, JUST THIS YEAR, and then he gives people in the military a paltry sum that doesn't even cover the extra money they've had to spend on goods and services.

I mean, I'd take the money, but the entire situation would fucking enrage me, and if anything make me more likely to be subversive and disobedient.

Especially when you consider some dumb bitch who committed treason got shot and killed while taking place in a seditious riot, and her family got a million dollars from tax payers and a soldiers burial despite never being in the military.

But if you dedicate your life to serving your country and following your training, you'll get forced to follow illegal orders, possibly killed\wounded for life, and you get barely enough to cover a rent check.

The first group of servicemen that ride hard on Pete, Stephen, Bondi, Johnson, Noem, Trump, Thomas, Roberts, Beer Boi, and the Jesus whore will be fucking heros, and incredibly well compensated.

The victors determine how history will be written.

[–] Estiar@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

One correction, it's considered BAH (housing allowance) so it isn't taxed