this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
360 points (99.7% liked)
Librewolf
357 readers
9 users here now
Overview:
The secure and private firefox fork!
Related:
founded 1 year ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I currently use Waterfox, but have never tried LibreWolf. What made you swap?
I just switched to Waterfox today. I'm also curious about what the differences are.
In short: LibreWolf is for those who want a "locked-down" fortress out of the box, while Waterfox is for those who want a privacy-conscious browser that still feels like a normal, convenient daily driver.
Choose LibreWolf if: You want the highest level of privacy without having to manually edit config files, and you don’t mind occasionally "fixing" a broken website or re-logging into accounts.
Choose Waterfox if: You want a privacy-respecting browser that supports Firefox Sync, has an Android counterpart, and handles streaming sites/logins without any extra friction (it supports WideWine out of the box, which lets you stream DRM protected content (netflix, hulu, disney, etc).
Great summary. One additional note: Using LibreWolf with the KeePassXC extension makes the issue with re-logging into accounts much less of a hassle. However, the extension unfortunately doesn't work well when using the Flatpak package of LibreWolf. So, if there is a native LibreWolf package for your distribution, use that one; it should give you a good experience.
Pepole say that with some fiddling it is possible to get KeePassXC integrated even with the Flatpak version, but I for one wasn't successful in that. So, if there is no native package for your distro, try compiling LibreWolf yourself, or perhaps try the AppImage, or else you may have one reason more to choose Waterfox (at least if there is a native Waterfox package for your distro).