this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
40 points (93.5% liked)

Programming

24044 readers
609 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
snowe@programming.dev
Ategon@programming.dev
MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz
UlrikHD@programming.dev
40
Coming soon: Simpler pricing and a better experience for GitHub Actions - GitHub Changelog (Adds self-hosted runner cost) (github.blog)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Kissaki@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

On January 1, 2026, GitHub will reduce the price of GitHub-hosted runners by up to 39% depending on the machine type used. The free usage minute quotas will remain the same.

On March 1, 2026, GitHub will introduce a new $0.002 per minute GitHub Actions cloud platform charge that will apply to self-hosted runner usage. Any usage subject to this charge will count toward the minutes included in your plan, as explained in our GitHub Actions billing documentation.

Runner usage in public repositories will remain free. There will be no changes in price structure for GitHub Enterprise Server customers.

We are increasing our investment into our self-hosted experience to ensure that we can provide autoscaling for scenarios beyond just Linux containers.

Historically, self-hosted runner customers were able to leverage much of GitHub Actions’ infrastructure and services at no cost.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

but the whole thing is self-hosted, not just the action runner, right?

[–] aichan@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, I believe so, sorry. I wonder if codeberg permits something like this?

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Maybe. The problems I have with codeberg are the lack of support to private repos and the 100 repo limit. I have some personal stuff in version control that I prefer to keep private, like notes, dotfiles, and shell history.

At the same time, I'm not sure I want to maintain a self-hosted forge.

[–] cymor@midwest.social 2 points 1 week ago

Forgejo has been really low maintenance for me. I update the docker image version every so often, and that's about it.