this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2025
28 points (93.8% liked)

Public Health

1246 readers
38 users here now

For issues concerning:


🩺 This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.



Related Communities

See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link (!medicine@lemmy.world)


Rules

Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.

Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content

Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lag@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I hope he doesn't need to find out. But if he's alive unfortunately he needs to be contacted. I'm not sure if I would live with that kind of guilt.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

There is no guilt to live with. It's not like he knew.

It appears he probably does know now, based on this:

The man is healthy, and was healthy at the time of donation — he passed the necessary screening checks to donate, but some of his cells’ DNA mutated before he was born, damaging the TP53 gene, which plays a crucial role in preventing cancerous cells from spreading.

While most of the donor’s body does not contain the damaged gene, up to 20 per cent of his sperm do, the investigation found.