this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2025
13 points (69.7% liked)
Nintendo
22632 readers
148 users here now
A community for everything Nintendo. Games, news, discussions, stories etc.
Rules:
- Stay on topic.
- No NSFW content.
- No hate speech or personal attacks.
- No ads / spamming / trolling / self-promotion / low effort posts / memes etc.
- No linking to, or sharing information about, hacks, ROMs or any illegal content. And no piracy talk. (Linking to emulators, or general mention / discussion of emulation topics is fine.)
- No console wars or PC elitism.
- Be a decent human (or a bot, we don't discriminate against bots... except in Point 8).
- All bots must have mod permission prior to implementation and must follow instance-wide rules. For lemmy.world bot rules click here
- Links to Twitter, X, or any alternative version such as Nitter, Xitter, Xcancel, etc. are no longer allowed. This includes any "connected-but-separate" web services such as pbs. twimg. com. The only exception will be screenshots in the event that the news cannot be sourced elsewhere.
Upcoming First Party Games (NA):
Game | Date
|
Metroid Prime 4 | Dec 4
Mario Tennis Fever [S2] | Feb 12
Pokémon Pokopia [S2] | Mar 5
Fire Emblem: Fortune's Weave [S2] | 2026
Super Mario Bros. Wonder [S2] | 2026
Rhythm Heaven: Groove | 2026
The Duskbloods [S2] | 2026
Tomodachi Life: Living the Dream | 2026
Yoshi and the Mysterious Book | 2026
Spaltoon Raiders [S2] | TBA
Pokémon Champions | TBA
[S2] means Switch 2 only.
Other Gaming Communities
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Oh look: tons of comments explaining how this is a ridiculous product that shouldn't exist.
And yet it's going to sell and be profitable.
Re-releasing old games is a great thing. Keep everything available, give consumers options, increase the size of libraries for every platform. Enhanced resolutions and better load times. It's a free upgrade if you already own the Anniversary edition on Switch.
Rather than asking why they are doing this, I think the real question should be why was this not a launch title months ago?
Perhaps they should do it for more games than Skyrim.
There’s a great back catalog.
Eh I think Fallout 4 is the only one that would really work with.
You could have maybe argued for Oblivion, but I think they made the right call in re-making it. (I know Bethesda calls it a "re-master", but imo when you start re-doing models, NPC behaviors, and voice lines that crosses the threshold into "re-make").
I think Fallout 3 would really benefit from the same re-make treatment Oblivion got. Morrowind too.
Starfield is current gen. Fallout 76 and Elder Scrolls Online are kind of different beasts as live-servics games. The older Elder Scrolls games are so outdated and janky that I think they would either have to completely re-imagine them into functionally new games, or just do a quick port (maybe upscale the resolution and add a few QoL improvements to call it a "re-master") in a cheap sort of "classics collection".
I haven't played the pre-Bethesda Fallout games, but they do look re-makeable. They're also nowhere near as popular as the rest of Bethesda's games so there may not be enough demand for them.
Of course, if there's a lot more options for games by other studios and published by Bethesda, but I could spend all day picking through that library and evaluating lol.
To clarify, I was talking all games in general. Not just BGS.
Which comment says the product shouldn't exist? Please point me to it.
I’ll say this product shouldn’t exist. Nintendo switch games are already playable on switch 2. Releasing this game again on a game system that can already play it is just a money grab.
Remakes and releases take development funds away from new IP. Same with live service. So I’m not a fan.
The YouTube comments
Ok. Just seems a bit odd as your comment is here under this post commenting the comments on YouTube.