this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2025
29 points (100.0% liked)
politics
22910 readers
65 users here now
Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.
Labour and union posts go to The Labour Community.
Take any slop posts to the slop trough
Main is good for shitposting.
Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.
Off topic posts will be removed.
Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
DSA chairs:
DSA chair sounds like a cursed job NGL. They have basically no enforcement power over most of what the org does since chapters are so independent. You want DSA to be associated with social democracy well too bad the Liberation caucus just posted about how based shooting Israeli government officials is and is calling for a DSA red guard. You want a proper revolutionary party? Well too bad New York has decided one more elected will get the job done.
I'm starting to see the advantages of a Democratic Centralist party structure like PSL's. I'm surprised there isn't a more democratic centralist Dem Soc org. I don't see the contradiction between a reformist path to socialism and democratic centralism, but maybe there is one I'm too ML to see. But I guess they're trying to be a big tent socialist thing. It's certainly got them numbers and some officials they can say they've elected, but that's about it.
Maybe we should just turn the DSA into the US version of the International or whatever that USSR organization of different socialist parties was lol. Just split it up into a bunch of more local parties all over the US. I guess it would probably lose some of the power it still has, though.
Functionally this is how DSA actually works. Most members are uncaucused but the caucuses run things and are quite rigid with their discipline, functioning like small parties in their own right in much the same way there were multiple factions of the RSDLP.