this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2025
279 points (96.7% liked)

collapse

322 readers
19 users here now

Placeholder for time being, moving from lemm.ee

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 

The threshold household income where a family can afford housing, healthcare, childcare, and transportation without relying on means-tested benefits is a lot higher than the official stats suggest.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Simple, we take the money from the rich, and give it to the poor. Cap maximum salary at $999,999,999; anything you make after that goes directly towards those who need it most. Get the entire world on-board, so there's nowhere for them to hide their money, eliminating billionaires entirely. Problem solved.

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This all assumes there is no inflation. At some point the system breaks mathematically, even with a steady 2.5% growth rate (which it is not at all accurate but that’s another topic).

The ownership class is planning wealth on generational levels. This represents a significantly larger amount of capital over a longer time frame.

Capping the allowed maximum salary doesn’t even begin to remotely address taxes on corporations and trusts. The wealthy do not pay themselves a high salary , their money is managed through funds.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You tie the wealth cap to inflation.

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

At this point the minimum wage also needs to be tied to inflation. Might as well bring it up to match productivity increases while you are at it.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

$999,999,999 is way too high.