this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2025
573 points (99.1% liked)

Funny

13625 readers
275 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HeurtisticAlgorithm9@feddit.uk 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Idk if the other guy is right, but it's not like they would add "to hunt down slaves" instead. So they might have put that to get the whole thing added on.

[–] MummysLittleBloodSlut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Right, but if the only way the slavers could get it in was to say it's for rebelling against tyranny, then it seems like rebelling against tyranny was the important concern.

Also I've read the declaration of secession by the confederate states and it was really explicit about slavery being the point. I think they would say it's for slavery if they thought they could get away with it

[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's wrong... kinda close, but wrong (not slaves - different non-white people). Wondering if a correction gets made.