this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2025
569 points (99.1% liked)

Funny

12569 readers
408 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] natecox@programming.dev 12 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Disagree. Every firearm I’ve ever handled has been loaded.

Sure, sometimes I’m wrong, but even a hint of “well it might not be loaded” seems like a dangerous slippery slope.

[–] MummysLittleBloodSlut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's no use reasoning with people who would rather be correct than be safe.

[–] natecox@programming.dev 2 points 6 days ago
[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There is a fallacy named after this.

If you treat loaded and unloaded guns with the same safety, you don't have to lie.

[–] natecox@programming.dev 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Is it the fallacy fallacy?

“I should treat this safely” is not “there is a bullet in this I’d better not fuck around”. Framing matters.

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

The slippery slope fallacy. Just because you just checked and know that the gun is unloaded doesn't inextricably lead to danger if you always treat a gun as if it were loaded.

You don't have to lie to yourself or others that the gun is loaded if it is not, just always treat it as if it is.

The only thing you do by lying is give people reason not to trust you.

[–] natecox@programming.dev 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 0 points 6 days ago

I know the fallacy fallacy. It doesn't apply in this case because you really were making a slippery slope argument with no evidence, and despite my counterarguments. But I don't have more time to spend on ashitpost lol