this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2025
30 points (100.0% liked)

Electric Vehicles

2016 readers
150 users here now

Overview:

Electric Vehicles are a key part of our tomorrow and how we get there. If we can get all the fossil fuel vehicles off our roads, out of our seas and out of our skies, we'll have a much better environment. This community is where we discuss the various different vehicles and news stories regarding electric transportation.


Related communities:


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/54358560

The European Commission said on Thursday it was reviewing tariffs on Volkswagen's electric vehicles built in China, which the automaker hopes could be replaced with an annual import quota and minimum price mechanism.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] x00z@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I replied to a comment implying slave labor buddy. Don't point at me.

"Slave labor" also means all kinds of other stuff like holding passports, offering housing but not enough money to get away from it, forcing extreme hours, etc.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

From the article:

China has sent a clear signal that it is willing to pull the plug on subsidies for its electric vehicle industry

That is a huge difference to having mostly phased out subsidies.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It started phasing them out in 2022, they reach 0 in 2027

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They are phasing out subsidies to buyers of EVs, but not the ones applying to Chinese exports of EVs. The Chinese even aknowledge that their susbidies created a massive oversupply, which means artifically low prices for them. That creates a huge problem for the European car industry, which did not get those subsidies.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

ones applying to Chinese exports

That's not a thing, if it was, exports would be cheaper than the same models on the domestic market. What is framed as subsidies is supporting the industry getting production up and and running.

There's no overcapacity as evidenced by China only exporting a tiny fraction of their production, and at profitable prices.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Maybe you should actually read the article you linked. It clearly speaks about overcapacity.

Also China is by far the biggest car producer in the world making up a third of global production. The exports are also massive. Last year the exported 5.859 million vehicles and grew more then 19%. The only countries producing more cars then China exports(only exports) are the US, Japan and India. Also this up until September Chinas car exports grew by 14.8% compared to the same period last year. So that would overtake Indias total car production of last year.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You're comparing absolute numbers without considering population differences, of course an industrial superpower, with 1.4 billion people, makes a shitton of cars. Meanwhile Germany produces 4x more cars for export than domestic consumption, and nobody says its overproduction.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That is most certainly the first time, I heared the United States of America described as a nobody.

Germany had 2.8million new cars sold in 2024 and a production of 4million cars. So net export is 1.2million cars. The difference is that Germany imports 4x more cars China does.

About the absolute and per capita. That does not make that much sense for trade. Countries with a smaller population have to specialize much more and trade in other products. Iceland would be stupid, if it had its own car industry for example, but it has a massive aluminium overproduction, which it can then trade for say cars. However larger countries are able to produce a lot more internally. So they tend to export and import less on a per capita bases. So yes China can not do certain things other smaller countries do, just due to its size. In this case even 4x lower net exports of cars then Germany, still mean 4x more cars being exported in total, which causes trouble around the world.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I can't see your first link because the site blocks Hong Kong, and the great firewall blocks CNBC.

But while America is a huge market, the big 4 are kinda garbage riding off half a century of anticompetitive trade practices, people literally only import them as conspicuous consumption, except Buick (GM), taxi drivers I've spoken to seem to like them. We would expect the US to export a smaller portion of our shitty, overpriced cars and import more cars.

still mean 4x more cars being exported in total, which causes trouble around the world.

Skill issue. Refusing to make better, cheaper cars, and just buying politicians and newspaper articles to support anti-competitive practices is how you get a median ev cost of >50K in the US.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago

It is about Trump wanting German car companies to move their production to the US. Which is also really important to stress that a lot of cars made in the US are not made by the big 4, but by Toyota, Hyundai, Volkswagen, BMW, Subaru and other foreign car companies. A lot of countries are looking for similar set ups from China as well. So stuff like BYD building factories in Thailand and Hungary for example.

[–] schizoidman@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

Much of China cars exports are from petrol cars.

China floods the world with gasoline cars it can't sell at home

China’s gasoline-vehicle exports alone – not including EVs and plug-in hybrids – were enough last year to make it the world’s largest auto-exporting nation by volume, industry and government data show.