this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2025
57 points (100.0% liked)
HistoryArt
447 readers
49 users here now
This magazine is for sharing artwork of historical events, places, personages, etc. Scale models and the like also welcome!
MORE COMMS ON THE HISTORYVERSE:
- !historymusic@quokk.au
- !historygallery@quokk.au
- !historymemes@piefed.social
- !historyruins@piefed.social
- !historyartifacts@piefed.social
- !historyphotos@piefed.social
founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Does anyone knwo by chance whether this progression followed some sort of "optimization" pattern, I.e. were the armors getting better and better or not really?
Essentially, the armor got more complex, expensive, and invulnerable up until ~1600 AD. Honestly, anything ~1440 AD onward is borderline invincible if well-made. The only real way to get through it at the time was sticking a dagger through the visor, or bludgeoning them to death, since even thick padding can only reduce impact force so much. Some warhammers and poleaxes could be used to crush and puncture their way through, but it's still very difficult to get a solid enough hit in with them on a moving armored target.
After ~1600 AD, the expense and the weight that was needed to counter increasingly powerful firearms made armor just not worth it, in cost or weight, and it 'reverted' to leather jackets and metal cuirasses, as in the last pic, before fading away completely.
Though all of these are essentially meant for mounted troops, the ~1610 and ~1650 examples are optimized for cavalry use.
Cool! Thanks for the detailed answer