this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2025
99 points (100.0% liked)

World News

980 readers
677 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person, don't post hate.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Non-europeans don't pay taxes to maintain the louvre, so they can enjoy it for much cheaper. Having the same price would be actual discrimination.

Cultural institutions are owned by the people of that culture, they should be cheaper (or even free) for them to enjoy.

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

How many items in these museums are specifically linked to French culture?

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

I have absolutely no idea. But I'm assuming a french museum has many links to french culture.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is the argument Trump used to raise prices on National Park entrance fees for foreign visitors

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

broken clock occasionally right and all that

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

It's just ironic because I remember the response being general outrage.

Personally I think most western nations can afford to keep their cultural institutions free or cheap for all. I always took a lot of pride in how the Smithsonian was free to all. It's the least we can do after spending billions on bombs

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you consider destroying tourism a good thing.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

I think tourists should pay for the impact of their tourism. If that means destructive tourism becomes unaffordable, that's a good thing.