this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2025
366 points (97.2% liked)

Gaming

6444 readers
219 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.


2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.


I should not need to explain this one.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.


Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.



Logo uses joystick by liftarn

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

The transition away from discs is not inherently bad. Discs read very slowly. Cartridges are better for load times.

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I always wondered why we didn’t transition to flash storage. Would be much easier to scale smaller releases, too.

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The Switch went back to it, or never left if you view it as a DS/3DS successor

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I thought about this right after replying. Really, the GC, Wii and Wii U were more exception than rule with Nintendo. They’ve always liked their cartridge formats.

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I remember Nintendo getting trolled for still using cartridges with the Nintendo 64 when Sony was already using discs and it looked like the future. Nintendo’s response even then was the cartridges were faster, basically eliminating load time.

[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

If only they could have figured out storage density back then.

Losing the RPGs to Sony was devastating to someone expecting (hoping) the N64 would be as good to the jrpg as the snes was.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

People seem weirdly attached to the idea of discs, in my experience. Without anything but anecdotes to back it up, I feel like people view discs as adult and cartridges as childish.

[–] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Might be a generational thing you're perceiving. For someone about my age, carts were what we used as little kids (NES, SNES) and a little longer if you stuck with Nintendo (N64) over PlayStation. The PlayStation kids tended to view Nintendo as "kid stuff."

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, I've considered that. Nintendo has mostly stuck to cartridges and their games are mostly cartoony, which is associated with childishness.

[–] feannag@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I feel like most people don't care they just want physical media and not be required to only go digital.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Actually, in that regard I feel like the majority of people are fine with the transition to fully digital.

[–] feannag@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

I doubt most are fine with it, but its not a priority enough to not buy a specific game.

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Switch carts are way easier to lose for one. Hard to lose a blu ray in my experience

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

Disc was way cheaper to produce

[–] nuko147@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Nothing can reach an nvme drive. I heard Switch 2 had longer loading times from cartridges vs loading from internal storage or micro SD express card. And there is no way to store 100+GB games in there. Yeah textures in 4k hurt.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

Kinda moot these days when everything is using flash storage. Transfering a Blu-Ray to storage at 100MB/s before playing is an acceptable compromise if it means you can use the fastest possible storage for all games, without the cost.

Of course, this wouldn't work on a portable not named PSP

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I rather a game load a little bit slower than having to spend hundreds more for expanded storage or waste hours manually installing and uninstalling games.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

I think you're probably in the minority on that one.