this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
14 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

1127 readers
134 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1-3, 6 & 7 No longer applicable

Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

The Epstein Files: Trump, Trafficking, and the Unraveling Cover-Up

Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)

Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

Video: Macklemore's new song critical of Trump and Musk is facing heavy censorship across major platforms.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Following reports that the Trump administration is eyeing a “deadly new phase” of military actions against Venezuela, including land strikes, a new report suggests that the US troops stationed near the South American nation are being denied holiday leave in anticipation of immediate action.

On Monday, NewsNation White House Correspondent Kellie Meyer reported via social media that the United States Southern Command (SOUTHCOM) is “restricting/limiting leave over the Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays in preparation for possible land strikes in the next 10 days to two weeks.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Would it actually be an illegal order to attack Venezuela?

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Yes. It's an unlawful invasion. It would be like Russia going into Ukraine.

[–] Dionysus@leminal.space 2 points 4 months ago

It would be like Russia going into Ukraine.

Well that makes it good to go for the red states.

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Well I agree it would be bad. But would it be illegal / unconstitutional based on US law?
Like, as much as I hate Russia's aggression, I doubt their soldiers are breaking Russian law.
I believe that when U.S. troops pledge to follow the law, they are talking about US law and its constitution, not international 'law'.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

American law? I don't think American troop are beholden to the word court. And that's not what they pledge to uphold.
Did the U.S. troops in Iraq break the U.S. law (no war was declared for that)?