this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2025
650 points (98.7% liked)

Political Memes

9872 readers
2132 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 days ago (2 children)

if they generate a million people's world of CO2 each, that's the pollution of 3 billion people!!!

Which is why I doubt that that's true. For it to be true, you'd probably have to do some kind of calculation like "if this privately owned company is owned by a billionaire, then assign all CO2 emissions from its entire operations to that one individual". So, if you eliminated them, you actually wouldn't eliminate those CO2 emissions. Someone would take over that business and it would continue putting out CO2 as long as someone was buying its products and/or services.

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 days ago

The science is available for you to double check the math and methods. Go do that and show us your findings if you dispute the results instead of baselessly assuming it isn't true because it doesn't fit your preconceived assumptions.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's likely that the "million times more than the average person" includes the CO2 emissions from their stocks. still, making them scared is the easiest way to stop them from burning the planet where I live.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But you're not going to make them scared by publishing made up news stories like this. What will make them scared is politicians who they haven't bought being in power.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We're getting there. one Mamdani/Kat at a time.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I just wish it wasn't 2 steps forward, 1 step back. Lina Khan and Jonathan Kanter were really scaring the billionaires, but not only did they lose their jobs when Trump won, it seemed likely that Harris was going to ditch them if she won too.

the status quo will fight any change tooth and nail. not going to be easy