this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2025
4 points (60.0% liked)

Privacy

2938 readers
70 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Kinda of a poor write up. I have my issues with this but signal doesn't really use phone numbers internally, it uses hashes of phone numbers. It's not as straight forward as this article makes it seem, and this is readily available information that the author could have found.

[–] gtr@programming.dev 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hashing doesn't really do anything because there are too few possible phone numbers. Easy to bruteforce. See the researchers who enumerated the WhatsApp users database recently via the internet...

[–] IceFoxX@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Hold up. They also have profile pictures and other stuff. So Meta offered the option to create a global phone book, but also to create a phone book of children worldwide + a timeline of profile pictures. Meta's statement was that it wasn't a big deal because it was public data... So Meta's pedos dream phone book is something else entirely.