this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025
764 points (94.3% liked)

linuxmemes

28036 readers
512 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ Language/язык/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  • Β 

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] starman2112@lemmy.world 77 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

    The one who steals prototype liquid coolers, fucks up installation, and slanders their manufacturers

    [–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 85 points 3 days ago (1 children)

    Oh yeah, and disallowing employees from discussing their income, I think was another one.

    Lots of anti-union behavior.

    [–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 44 points 3 days ago (1 children)

    Im very happy to see people aren't downplaying what a shitty guy he is here.

    Like the way you treat your employees and the people you work with is shit that actually matters.

    I don't give a shit if someone is clumsy for entertainment, I give a shit when their workspace is a good ol boys club, sweatshop, and then when they decide to threaten a defamation lawsuit against a former female employee they brought in under very suspect circumstances in the first place all because they couldn't find evidence within their company they admit has an awful HR department.

    Just a fucking mess, and I hate that shitty people just succeed nowadays.

    [–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

    "brought in under suspect circumstances"

    Genuinely curious at what you're hinting at here. I thought I was fairly familiar with the story, but I thought that employee was mostly brought in because she was popular with viewers, is there something more sinister there too?

    [–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

    Its been a while so my memory is hazy, but basically, she recently lost her support systems and was brought to a new country where she basically couldn't afford to lose that job. This adds a lot of context to her statements after when combined with other details about the company. Hopefully someone else remembers better, because Im sure there was something more sketchy about it Im failing to remember.

    [–] Thrashy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

    Madison's thread detailing the whole thing is available here if you want to refresh your memory, but the TLDR is that, at least as of 2-3 years ago, LTT maintained a sweatshop production pace, was a hostile workplace in several dimensions, and executed a rugpull on Madison in terms of permitting and supporting her independent efforts in a way that created a practically textbook claim of promissory estoppel.

    In the wake of the blowup, Linus and LTT more generally did make a lot of appropriately sorrowful noises and promised to do better, and I suppose it's possible that they have done so, but I don't really consume their content and TBH haven't bothered to check.

    [–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

    That's what most people took away from the drama. No one looked into it later to find out was made up because that's no longer interesting. As is usually the case with Internet drama.

    (Emails eventually came out showing Billet Labs told them to keep the cooler, and then lied about it)

    [–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

    (Emails eventually came out showing Billet Labs told them to keep the cooler, and then lied about it)

    Which is why LTT made a monetized apology video saying it was an accident and they had intended to return it, right? A video in which they leaked a private phone number related to Billet Labs, might I add.

    The person you responded to provided a simplified explanation. You, on the other hand, have provided one that is false.

    Billet Labs initially stated that they could keep it, yes, but after the ridiculous, defamatory review performed on the entirely wrong hardware, they requested it back, which LMG agreed to provide prior to selling it at auction.

    [–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

    Yes, once Billet changed their mind after not liking the review, they mistakenly sold it and paid them back.

    What are you saying was made up?

    Billet gave them the prototype because they thought they were going to make use of it. They installed it wrong/on the wrong card and then shat all over the product. Billet asked for it back if they weren't planning on using it further as it was an expensive prototype and they agreed.