this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025
106 points (99.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

14114 readers
284 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Late last week, Torched's Alissa Walker broke a story about LAX getting construction underway on a massive roadway expansion. When complete, it will send even more cars into the already gridlocked central "horseshoe" roadway. Widening the roads leading into an unchanged horseshoe will, you guessed it, worsen congestion in the horseshoe.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Humana@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

LAX is my go to example of how bullshit transit planning in America is and why sometimes doing nothing is better than doing the wrong thing.

The horseshoe is HELL, and in 1995 they tried to build transit to the airport but budget cuts and other shenanigans led to the Aviation/Imperial station 2.7 miles away and shuttle buses that also got stuck in the horrible horseshoe traffic. The station was barely used by any airport employees much less any travelers, virtually nothing was accomplished.

Then in 2025 they try again, but bullshit prevails again and they spend $900 million on a station 2.3 miles away, and $3.3 BILLION on a people mover.

I'm sorry there is no reasonable explanation for why the new station was't built in the horseshoe all along.

Not learning from these mistakes São Paulo's main airport did the exact same thing.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

On the bright side, they're right on schedule to build a transit station 1.9 miles away in 2055.

[–] Humana@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

For only $157 billion, at this rate it'll be cheaper to demolish the airport and rebuild it just to put the station where it should have been all along...

[–] Burninator05@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

That is exactly the kind of out-of-the-box thinking that's missing today.

[–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

how the fuck? My city just built a full elevated metro that also connects directly to the airport for 8 billion CAD (6bil USD). How does the LAX station cost that much?

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Are they just terrified of eminent domain or is there a problem with the ground or something? Like the government can just buy the land they need. Yes it'll piss people off but most people will be much happier.

[–] Humana@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The brand new $5.5 billion SoFi stadium opened in 2020, and has a brand new $2.2 billion light rail line opened in 2022 (the same line that the LAX people mover is connecting to) that passes 1.6 miles away, but it also doesn't have a station. My understanding is the stadium owner used their political power to block it because they charge $140 to park per car for NFL games. Recently because of the upcoming Olympics they were going to spend $2 billion on a people mover to the stadium.

Think about that, the original metro line was $2.2 billion, they then spent $3.3 billion fixing the mistake of not actually connecting to the airport, and then they tried to spend another $2 billion fixing the mistake of not connecting to the stadium. $5.3 billion on people movers, trying to correct the shortsighted mistakes from the original build. And if they had done it the obviously right way the first time you could just get off the metro and be at your destination instead of getting off, navigating a connection, waiting for the next people mover...

https://laist.com/news/transportation/la-metro-crenshaw-lax-rail-line-opening-what-to-expect

https://labusinessjournal.com/special-reports/infrastructure-los-angeles-international-airport/

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-07-18/rep-maxine-waters-sofi-stadium-people-mover-olympics

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Jesus fucking shit that's infuriating.

[–] Humana@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's more infuriating because 99% of the time when they make these bad route decisions they will cite cost. But then are ready to spend orders of magnitude more per mile on less convenient and more expensive to operate people movers to fix the route mistake later.

Pennywise, pound foolish doesn't even begin to describe...