this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2025
283 points (96.4% liked)

People Twitter

8520 readers
1693 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The sad truth is that we use animals for studies that specifically would not be ethical for humans. Like you said, it's still important science than needs to be done, even if it can be unseemly.

The coping mechanism I was told was that most of these animals were bred for this exact purpose, and will be disposed of at the end of the study. I don't know if that really makes our actions any better, but it does help me accept things.

What got me through the rat sudies in college was three things my statistics professor (who ran the rat studies) telling me three things.

They have better Healthcare than you do. They have to be healthy and cared for and all the shots and vet visits possible

Like you said, they do get born for this and are ethically killed

Their life use has to be calculated, scrutinized, debated, and approved by boards designed to keep the horrors of unchecked science at bay. If you want rats to do cocaine, you'll need 30 pages of explanations and forms and approved methodology and proposed scientific benefit, and then they decide if it's worthy or not. Then when you're done, if ANYTHING goes wrong with those rats it has to be documented and explained and accepted or you've just got an absolute rain of hell falling on your tenure and future prospects in animal testing.