this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2025
1203 points (99.2% liked)

xkcd

13771 readers
213 users here now

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

xkcd #3167: Car Size

Title text:

'They really shouldn't let those small cars drive in traffic. I worry I'm going to kill someone if I hit one! They should have to drive on the sidewalk, safely out of the way.'

Transcript:

Transcript will show once it’s been added to explainxkcd.com

Source: https://xkcd.com/3167/

explainxkcd for #3167

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 84 points 5 days ago (27 children)

The number of massive trucks I see without a speck of dirt in the bed that are used mainly for commuting and groceries is pathetic.

[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 5 days ago (19 children)

If I could have a Fully electric mid 90s chevy S10 style pickup with modern safety features and no surveillance I would be sooooo happy. But no, if I want a truck I can buy old as fuck or get a wanktank. Closest option to what I want in the US currently is a Ford Maverick (which is literally just a rebadged explorer sport trac for the modern age) but that would mean supporting Ford, and like, fuck Ford.

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (11 children)

You're basically asking for what slate promises to be.

Also, you totally didn't say it, but I feel like whining about it so: A lot of people think that the infotainment in cars could be stripped out to lower the price, but a big touch screen is actually very cheap and it might even be more expensive to have a bunch of bespoke buttons per model, so really, the idea of a gutted out vehicle wouldn't save any money. The only actual money savers would be in areas like the suspension, build quality, engine size, that sort of thing.

[–] spankinspinach@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Correct me if I'm wrong, is Slate not Amazon backed? No judgement either way, I just know that rubs some lemmings the wrong way

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Oh don't worry, it isn't! Its just backed by Jeff Bezos himself.......

Yeah......

This world sucks, and sometimes you gotta make some shitty pragmatic choices. I would judge someone harshly for a Tesla but less so for Slate given that 1. Jeff isn't so openly racist so much as being a greedy bastard of a human being, and 2. Slate is backed by him but not fully owned by him.

Ah the fun of the world we live in...

Yeah 100%, I'm fully on board with your reasoning. I'm continuously arguing with myself over a Bronco or a Tacoma (only modern backcontry capable vehicles with manuals I'm aware of), so I do NOT have a moral high ground here haha

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

My understanding that the "Amazon backed" was a comparatively small portion of the funding, and largely to generate an air of legitimacy for the normies.

Absolutely fair, the more I know. Thanks for the clarification!

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)