166
this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2025
166 points (98.8% liked)
Linux
10148 readers
665 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)
Also, check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Better than I could have ever put it. But to add my own thoughts,
sudo-rsdoes not gain value just by being in Rust.sudowith compatability for common flags while intentionally not implementing niche/legacy options, including the one used by CVE-2025-32463, though if I did not need any of those flags at all, I would (and in past, have) just useopendoas.sudoand has caught regressions in it. The rewrite wanting parity withsudo's behavior has improved the originalsudo; you can gain its benefits even if you won't/don't/can't run it. This is the main reasonuutilshasn't convinced me of its worth yet.sudois just good. By translating it, they have to understand many ofsudo's poorly-documented idiosyncracies and review all its relevant code and consider potential potential edge-cases. That's basically an audit.