this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2025
290 points (87.6% liked)

Technology

76799 readers
5009 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Passkeys are built on the FIDO2 standard (CTAP2 + WebAuthn standards). They remove the shared secret, stop phishing at the source, and make credential-stuffing useless.

But adoption is still low, and interoperability between Apple, Google, and Microsoft isn’t seamless.

I broke down how passkeys work, their strengths, and what’s still missing

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If they can intercept my password despite TLS, they can probably also steal my session.

That's not necessarily true: it could leak due to flaw or defect that doesn't affect the session token.

Security is all about layers & reducing risk/surface area of attack. By getting your secret, they can leak it. Leaking a secret they don't have, however, is impossible: that's secure by design.

I’m going to disagree that passkeys really have multifactor authentication built in.

Then you're disagreeing with standards & definitions. Passkeys are encrypted in an authenticator that needs a biometric or secret (ie, something you are or know) to unlock the key (something you have).

Authenticator is a multi-factor cryptographic authenticator that uses public-key cryptography to sign an authentication assertion targeted at the WebAuthn Relying Party. Assuming the authenticator uses either a facial recognition, fingerprint or PIN for user verification, the authenticator itself is something you have while the facial recognition and fingerprint (biometric) are something you are and the PIN is something you know.

my one attempt to use it

While it's fine to share, "I tried something once, it sucked" is not a great argument to generalize that the technology sucks or isn't better than your limited impression. Maybe piefed sucks: if piefed implemented password authentication wrong, would you blame password authentication?