Late Stage Capitalism

2466 readers

385 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

anticolonialist@lemmy.world

K1nsey6@lemmy.world

618

Republicans are honest fascists. Democrats are fascists in disguise. (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 month ago by EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml to c/latestagecapitalism@lemmy.world

245 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/6702513

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You are in duty bound to call their bourgeois-democratic and parliamentary prejudices what they are—prejudices. But at the same time you must soberly follow the actual state of the class-consciousness and preparedness of the entire class (not only of its communist vanguard), and of all the working people (not only of their advanced elements).

We're still in the pretty heavy wake of McCarthyism, we're not at "run our own candidates on the general ballot" yet, we're at "vote lesser evil on the general ballot while we run our own candidates locally and try to win primaries".

Whilst you lack the strength to do away with bourgeois parliaments and every other type of reactionary institution, you must work within them because it is there that you will still find workers who are duped by the priests and stultified by the conditions of rural life; otherwise you risk turning into nothing but windbags.

[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Even where there is no prospect of achieving their election the workers must put up their own candidates to preserve their independence, to gauge their own strength and to bring their revolutionary position and party standpoint to public attention. They must not be led astray by the empty phrases of the democrats, who will maintain that the workers’ candidates will split the democratic party and offer the forces of reaction the chance of victory. All such talk means, in the final analysis, that the proletariat is to be swindled. The progress which the proletarian party will make by operating independently in this way is infinitely more important than the disadvantages resulting from the presence of a few reactionaries in the representative body. If the forces of democracy take decisive, terroristic action against the reaction from the very beginning, the reactionary influence in the election will already have been destroyed.

Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, Address of the Central Comittee to the Communist League, 1850

Karl Marx on liberal 'lesser evil'

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah and I think 1) that was 175 years ago 2) that while a brilliant thinker on the subject of structures and inevitabilities, Marx was pretty naïve when it came to implementation.

[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lenin's push for participation in elections was due to the Duma which kept getting dissolved by the Czar for becoming increasingly anti monarchy. Between 1906 and 1917 several had been dissolved due to growing constitutional monarchy among the peasants.

Without historical context it sounds like lenin advocated participating in all bourgeoisie elections.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

Uh, no. The context is very clear, he offers it himself. He's talking about movements in other countries, where class consciousness isn't sufficient for more direct alternatives, specifically Germany. He didn't mention the Czar or the Duma once in this text.

You should really just read it, it's pretty short.

[–] catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How dare you be reasonable and actually try and solve problems instead of just complaining and demonizing anyone who's not left enough!

[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They did no such thing. They used a typical liberal approach by finding something that they think aligns with their ideology and claims 'gotcha'