this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2025
290 points (87.6% liked)

Technology

76799 readers
3867 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
290
Passkeys Explained: The End of Passwords (sentientrant.com)
submitted 2 days ago by sentientRant@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
232 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Passkeys are built on the FIDO2 standard (CTAP2 + WebAuthn standards). They remove the shared secret, stop phishing at the source, and make credential-stuffing useless.

But adoption is still low, and interoperability between Apple, Google, and Microsoft isn’t seamless.

I broke down how passkeys work, their strengths, and what’s still missing

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

While I use and love bitwarden, it's not exactly foss. Although there is a foss implementation of their server backend

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago

Vaultwarden (the free server implementation) also supports passkeys.

[–] kjetil@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

A cursory search lead to this thread from 2024 https://community.bitwarden.com/t/concerns-over-bitwarden-moving-away-from-open-source-what-does-our-future-hold/74800

where an employee stated

I’ll note that policy wise nothing changed. The referenced issue is a packaging bug, but the goal still is the dual licensing model, with the core being open source, and some (mostly enterprise) features being source-available.

Both the client and server are mostly open source. Some server features are paywalled. The alternative Vaultwarden server is fully open source, and much lighter on system resources.

Have there been any recent licensing shenanigans with BitWarden?