this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2025
729 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

76799 readers
3136 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
729
Surprise EU rollback of 'GDPR' digital-rights rules prompts alarm (euobserver.com)
submitted 3 days ago by schizoidman@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world
128 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/52834195

https://archive.is/je5sj

“If adopted, these amendments would not simplify compliance but hollow out the GDPR’s and ePrivacy’s core guarantees: purpose limitation, accountability, and independent oversight,” Itxaso Dominguez de Olazabal, from the European Digital Rights group, told EUobserver.

The draft includes adjustments to what is considered “personal data,” a key component of the GDPR and protected by Article 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So you are saying that weakening these regulations makes it easier for these companies to train AI on that data?

That's exactly what I've been saying all along too. I'm not sure what you think is being argued about here, or what you think I'm not understanding.

[–] ag10n@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You’re the one asking questions about changing it

It’s clear that weaker regulations allow them to do more with impunity as I originally stated

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No I'm not, I was explaining why I thought they changed it. You appeared to be arguing that there was some other reason, so I was asking what you thought that reason was.

As it turns out, though, you're saying they changed it for exactly the same reasons I said they were changing it. To let them more easily train AI on that data. So that leaves me wondering what exactly the point of all this was.

[–] ag10n@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I suggest you revisit each response where you asked a question and let me know the count

All data on the internet is crawled and farmed. Weakening regulations doesn’t change this behaviour, just makes it legal

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I wrote:

You appeared to be arguing that there was some other reason, so I was asking what you thought that reason was.

Emphasis added. I only asked questions to clarify what you were saying, since it was unclear.

Weakening regulations doesn’t change this behaviour, just makes it legal

Which, in turn, makes it easier to do.

If you don't think it makes it easier then we're back at square one, you don't seem to be presenting any reason why this change would be made.

[–] ag10n@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

So you admit that you asked questions, specifically why, then told me my answer was your answer

Peak interaction you’ve got there