Linux Questions

2845 readers

21 users here now

Linux questions Rules (in addition of the Lemmy.zip rules)

stay on topic
be nice (no name calling)
do not post long blocks of text such as logs
do not delete your posts
only post questions (no information posts)

Tips for giving and receiving help

be as clear and specific
say thank you if a solution works
verify your solutions before posting them as facts.

Any rule violations will result in disciplinary actions

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip

How do you feel about Flatpak? Do you like having universal packages separated from the operating system, or do you regret how much space they take? (piefed.zip)

submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by Blaze@piefed.zip to c/linuxquestions@lemmy.zip

45 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I was reading a bit about it recently, seems like there two positions are valid, curious to see what people here think.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Deconceptualist@leminal.space 9 points 3 days ago

I prefer native builds when possible, since they tend to be more streamlined and tailored for my distro (e.g. window borders, colors, and buttons all match).

But Flatpak is a good fallback. It's a lot to ask of maintainers to keep up more than a few builds, at least on small / low-budget projects. The occasional permission issues are a minor price for a huge convenience.

IMO apt, pacman, and Flathub are all about equally straightforward to use once you acclimate a little.