this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2025
53 points (98.2% liked)

news

369 readers
1237 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I’m not in the persons’ shoes but why on earth would you continue on your globetrotting itinerary after an anaphylactic reaction in a three year old without visiting a hospital? Or at least a doctor? It says right on the EpiPens to administer and then immediately seek emergency medical care.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Once it over, it's over. Can't see what a doctor could do after the fact.

[–] whats_a_lemmy@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago

Yes, but it's not necessarily over after using the EpiPen...

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

Just like a heart attack?

No, with a life threatening event like anaphylaxis it is imperative to attend a hospital immediately, preferably via ambulance so the paramedics can address any issues.

Epinephrine can cause significant disturbance to the cardiovascular system and may have lead-on effects, and as seen in this case, anaphylaxis isn’t simply “over”.