World News

901 readers

620 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person, don't post hate.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Deceptichum@quokk.au

Grainne@lemmy.dbzer0.com

PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au

131

Supreme Court to weigh longshot bid to overturn same-sex marriage precedent (edition.cnn.com)

submitted 4 days ago by SourGumGum@lemmy.world to c/world@quokk.au

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 35 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Second. Pretty sure we'll see same sex marriage and interracial marriage overturned or otherwise infringed upon in some way.

[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What's next, overturning the 13th amendment?

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

That would require the Constitution to still exist by then ...

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

"Interracial" is getting harder and harder to define every year.

"Lemme see, you're 1/8th Asian, 1/4 Caucasian, 1/2 African, 1/8th Indigenous American.... and you wanna marry a lady who is 1/2 Asian, 1/4 African, and 1/4 Caucasian... according to the SCOTUS2025 test, neither of you are white enough or black enough to marry anybody !"

[–] grue@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You say that as if racists would consider it a problem.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago

One drop rule. Simple as.

Don't tell them about their minor semitic, african or first nations genetic markers though. 🤫

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 1 points 3 days ago

all them could marry each other but not other whites?