this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2025
74 points (97.4% liked)

Space

1907 readers
12 users here now

A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive. This means no harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  2. Engage in constructive discussions by discussing in good faith.
  3. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics

Please keep politics to a minimum. When science is the focus, intersection with politics may be tolerated as long as the discussion is constructive and science remains the focus. As a general rule, political content posted directly to the instance’s local communities is discouraged and may be removed. You can of course engage in political discussions in non-local communities.


Related Communities

πŸ”­ Science

πŸš€ Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To be fair, terraforming those mostly involves doing what we are doing here, but on an even higher scale. The hard part is really just getting stuff from here to there.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The next hard part is the dust. Lunar and Martian dust is a huge problem to overcome, and something we don't have to deal with here. Then there's radiation, although there's things we can do to lessen that problem.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I am curious how solar winds would deplete any gasses we vent onto the surface of Mars when it doesn't have a magnetic field to stop or slow any of it. πŸ€”

[–] GreatTitEnthusiast@mander.xyz 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My understanding is that solar winds stripping your atmo is so slow it's a problem on the scale of millions of years

Let me check a source

...

https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-mission-reveals-speed-of-solar-wind-stripping-martian-atmosphere/

Okay 21k lb during an earth day does seem like a lot

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's pretty insignificant on a planetary scale, earth loses atmo at TEN TIMES that rate πŸ˜„

[–] GreatTitEnthusiast@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm just worried it's going to be expensive to keep the atmo replenished

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago

A civilization that can add enough gases to Mars to create close to Earth's atmosphere isn't concerned with minor maintenance like that. A small comet body's worth every hundred years (if even that often), child's play.