Fairvote Canada
What is This Group is About?
De Quoi Parle ce Groupe?
The unofficial non-partisan Lemmy movement to bring proportional representation to all levels of government in Canada.
🗳️Voters deserve more choice and accountability from all politicians.
Le mouvement non officiel et non partisan de Lemmy visant à introduire la représentation proportionnelle à tous les niveaux de gouvernement au Canada.
🗳️Les électeurs méritent davantage de choix et de responsabilité de la part de tous les politiciens.

- A Simple Guide to Electoral Systems
- What is First-Past-The-Post (FPTP)?
- What is Proportional Representation (PR)?
- What is a Citizens’ Assembly?
- Why Referendums Aren't Necessary
- The 219 Corrupt MPs Who Voted Against Advancing Electoral Reform
Related Communities/Communautés Associées
Resources/Ressources
Official Organizations/Organisations Officielles
- List of Canadian friends of Democracy Bluesky
- Fair Vote Canada: Bluesky
- Fair Voting BC: Bluesky
- Charter Challenge for Fair Voting: Bluesky
- Electoral Renewal Canada: Bluesky
- Vote16: Bluesky
- Longest Ballot Committee: Bluesky
- ~~Make Votes Equal / Make Seats Match Votes~~
- Ranked Ballot Initiative of Toronto (IRV for municipal elections)
We're looking for more moderators, especially those who are of French and indigenous identities.
Politiques de modération de contenu
Nous recherchons davantage de modérateurs, notamment ceux qui sont d'identité française et autochtone.
view the rest of the comments
Polanski with a majority at 30% doesn't sound bad to me. 😄 Get those far-left Marxists in!
Either labour loses all power or passes pr with the other parties.
I think they'd lose power at this point. They're showing little competence in anything and they got rid of their progressive ideologues so.. I doubt they'd have the will to do electoral reform.
They never will do electoral reform. For most of recent history they've been one of the two big parties and the two big parties under FPTP will never implement any proportional representation.
I slightly disagree about the competence because everyone seems to have forgotten the train wreck that was the conservatives post-brexit.
They're moving ahead with sensible boring policies that don't get talked about in the media because there's nothing here to get the population angry about: planning law reforms, Great British Energy (a nationalised green energy producer), Great British Railways (renationalising the railways), and more Metro-mayors reforming local government into a much simpler three-tier system that devolves more powers to local authorities.
The issues are:
They keep fumbling the public relations and scoring own goals (see winter fuel payments and the wanking licence, both policies the conservatives set in motion that they could have stopped but didn't have the spine to).
They keep bending over to try and appease Reform talking points instead of standing on their own principles. This won't win over Reform voters who are already laying all of their financial woes at the feet of whatever enemy Farage and Robinson tell them to be angry about, and it keeps pissing off their left leaning supporters.
They're not willing to tackle the biggest issue: wealth inequality. The party has clearly already bent the knee to billionaires and corporations that attend DAVOS even before Kier got elected.
That last one is the biggest fumble of them all because increasing wealth inequality is what is drives the growing dispair and frustration that Farage feeds off and tells them to direct their anger at immigrants/trans people/whatever minority target they chose.
This is why I hope Zack Polanski can continue to apply pressure from the left and I hope that the Greens are able to assemble their own set of prominent talking heads and potential MPs that get the media attention needed to push public conversation towards the left again, very difficult to do in a Murdoch captured media landscape.
The same thing was said about New Zealand and now they have mixed-member proportional. The tories and labour would pass pr if enough people protest for it.
I like your optimism, but Labour have had it on their manifesto a few times and then once they get in power quietly drop it. Also there was a referendum a decade ago when the Lib Dems threw their lot in with the Tories just to try and get AV implemented.
They lost that referendum badly.