this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2025
69 points (94.8% liked)

Selfhosted

60587 readers
1338 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the link in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post. )

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What if you could buy off the shelf a box based on #opensource software and hardware that you could plug into your internet connection. You could connect to via Wifi and it would allow an average person to fairly easily configure, via a guided setup, a self hosted Cloud Drive, Social Media server, home automation service, VPN end point, email server and other commonly useful software?

What if that box allowed that person's friends to authenticate and to that box and link a box they own, either close by or remotely. It could extend connectivity and estabilish a chain of trus, provide a level of encrypted backup of content from that box and make assertions about the users on that box such as - This user account is owned by this person, this user account is over 18?

This is a dream. I know I'm rambling. #openwrt, #yunohost, #seflhost, #chainoftrust, #fediverse

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

My problem with chains of trust is the Kevin Bacon problem. Sure, I trust my friends, but some of their friends can be a little sketchy. Plus, they don't have any direct social contact with me, nor any personal consequences for betrayal. And nevermind the sketchy friends of the sketchy friends.

Federation has its uses, but trust is not one of them.

[–] abeorch@friendica.ginestes.es 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

@tburkhol Yeah chain of trust requires social connections (link how we build trust in our real lives ) it doesn't answer the question - Do I trust this person - but it least allows me to ask - could I trust this person - Friends of friends - I'd probably only trust them with encrpyted backups of bits of any particular photo where I know they don't have either the whole photo or the encrptyion keys to decrypt it.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Would you allow the converse: FoF to store data on your system? Data that could be CSAM - maybe encrypted, maybe not - 'terrorism' content, etc?