this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2025
52 points (100.0% liked)

news

208 readers
580 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zer0_F0x@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Modern nuclear weapons carry multiple warheads per missile launched, each individually controlled. You can strike a dozen different cities in one launch.

They have 3 phases: Launch, coast, re-entry. You can intercept them successfully in the first two.

Once the warheads have been jettisoned from the missile it's really hard to get them in the re-entry phase, they're really small and come in at Mach 10 and there's dozens of them.

The US has a system that can supposedly intercept a few but it's not gonna be nearly enough to make any meaningful difference.

The only way to "win" a nuclear war is to first know exactly where absolutely every single one of your enemy's nukes are and then striking all of the launch sites first without your massive preparation to do so being detected.

[–] gressen@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You're quoting details about ballistic missiles but this news in about w cruice missile - totally different thing.

[–] Zer0_F0x@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Those are the "invincible" ones the person above me has in their mind.

This new missile is a cruise missile indeed, which can be intercepted with most anti aircraft solutions