this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
78 points (100.0% liked)
Ukraine
12255 readers
410 users here now
News related to Ukraine
Community Rules
πΊπ¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
π»π€’No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
π₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
π·[Combat] videos containing footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW
No AI slop
β Server Rules
- Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
- No racism or other discrimination
- No Nazis, QAnon or similar
- No porn
- No ads or spam (includes charities)
- No content against Finnish law
π³ Defense Aid π₯
π³ Humanitarian Aid βοΈβοΈ
πͺ Volunteer with the International Legionnaires
See also:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Of course, didn't mean to imply otherwise.
Just pointing out that historically it's all about Moscow and St Petersburg.
I trust our forces.
Here's my uneducated guess on the subject.
There is only so much reserve equipment that the utility services can keep in stock. So it doesn't really matter where the first wave of attacks hit, as long as it does extensive damage that draws down the stocked up supplies. Russia is forced to use up the stock to get the power back on to the affected regions.
Then hitting the better defended locations in the Moscow/St. Petersburg become a several week/months blackout instead of a minor inconvenience of a few hours or days.
If the regions hit are also areas for refineries and equipment manufacturing for the war it's a continuation of infrastructure degradation not terror bombing like the Russians are doing.
I hope you are right, sounds like a solid theory. :)
Me too. ))