this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2025
37 points (95.1% liked)

Comradeship // Freechat

2637 readers
162 users here now

Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.

A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn't fit other communities

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
felipeforte@lemmygrad.ml
ComradePupIvy@lemmygrad.ml
37
I swear I have heard all the same rhetorical defenses of liberal protest strategies come out of homeopathic medicine quacks before (lemmy.ml)
submitted 2 months ago by mistermodal@lemmy.ml to c/comradeship@lemmygrad.ml
24 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Conselheiro@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Coming up with an effective theory of action is a prerequisite for anything.

And using protests and wider non-communist upheavals as agitation is not an effective theory of action? There's an economy of effort, sure, but you're not presenting any alternatives here.

Clearly somebody hasn't read their Lenin.

One of the most basic tenants of ML theory is the organisation of a vanguard party that will symbiotically support and lead spontaneous working class struggles through agitation, propaganda and building worker organisations until the dominant class can no longer exercise power. What part of that are you even close to advocating?