this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
276 points (98.3% liked)

General Memes & Private Chuckle

362 readers
644 users here now

Welcome to General Memes

Memes for the masses, chuckles for the chosen.

Rule 1: Be Civil, Not CruelWe’re here for laughs, not fights.

  • No harassment, dogpiling, or brigading
  • No bigotry (transphobia, racism, sexism, etc.)
  • Keep it light — argue in the comments, not with insults

Rule 2: No Forbidden FormatsNot every image deserves immortality on the memmlefield. That means:

  • No spam or scams
  • No porn or sexually explicit content
  • No illegal content (seriously, don’t ruin the fun)
  • NSFW memes must be properly tagged

If you see a post that breaks the rules, report it so the mods can take care of it.

Otherwise consider this your call to duty. Get posting or laughing. Up to you

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BotsRuinedEverything@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The answer is the same as the original trolley problem. The only morally correct things to do is nothing, regardless of the outcome. If I don't pull the lever and my loved one dies it wasn't me who liked them. They were killed by whomever put them on the tracks.

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If I don't pull the lever and my loved one dies it wasn't me who liked them.

Freudian autocarrot

[–] nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

so I should keep the trolley running to kill the 1 billion people, and not divert it to run over my neighbors cousins old and dying cat?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

It's crazy how if you change the situation entirely you get a different result and optimal action

The point of the trolley problem isn't really about utilitarianism or whatever, it's to demonstrate that inaction can be an action.

[–] nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The action/non-action question is one part of the problem, but not the sole or defining one to me. An certainly there is no simple answer as you suggest.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's a secret they only teach you in Philosophy 102.

[–] nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 weeks ago

dang, I knew it!