this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
47 points (98.0% liked)
Linux
9892 readers
581 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)
Also, check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Fedora will get you the most stock Linux environment without all the caveats, and it's eash to switch from KDE to Gnome or whatever you want without fuss.
Mint is fine-ish, but has caveats when looking for support online.
I no longer recommend Ubuntu at all.
What are the caveats in your opinion?
Because of snaps? Or because of something else?
Mint caveats are that it's Mint. Yes, most solutions for Ubuntu will work with Mint, but it has Cinnamon for its DE, whereas the bulk of all Linux users are on KDE or Gnome, so that puts this new user at a disadvantage due to that simple difference.
Canonical just keeps making poor decisions with Ubuntu, and can't be trusted to keep putting the user first. Snaps, data/telemetry collection, attempting to shove ads into desktops, disengaging with the community, and all these subtle package shifts away from open community solutions to Canonical solutions.
Makes sense, thanks :)
Just FYI, or rather FTI, the arch wiki can still be a useful tool for non-arch distro. Debian also has a wiki.
They need to understand there are differences between arch and Mint, of course, and also some between Debian and Mint to an extent, but those tools can still provide helpful info.
I had a couple small issues and the Mint forums.sorted it out easily for ne, suoer helpful