this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2025
493 points (97.0% liked)

Greentext

7263 readers
979 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grimtuck@lemmy.world 32 points 4 days ago (12 children)

I'm about to have my first child at 48. I wasn't ready before now.

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 11 points 3 days ago (10 children)

Pardon me asking (and feel free to ignore): Isn’t that scary to have a child so late in life? I’m worried about the impact my age will have on my relationship with my kids and I’m roughly a decade younger.

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago (3 children)

200 years ago people also had kids quite late.

And we live so much longer than even 40 years ago. Life is so much better and safer now.

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 2 points 3 days ago

But the nuclear family is much younger, so today’s kids rely much more heavily and directly on their parents with respect to kids 200 years ago. The “village” build around multigenerational housing has disappeared, making the age of parents a much bigger factor than earlier on

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)